Regarding the Cost of Bitcoin Mining Misconceptions

By   Chris Bendiksen 6th June 2018

Hello, I’m Christopher Bendiksen — I head up research at CoinShares; lately we’ve heard some rather unsubstantiated claims about the energy consumption / climate impact of the bitcoin network repeated through various media channels.

The volume of these claims has gotten too loud to ignore — so, we’ve written a comprehensively researched paper on the current state of Bitcoin mining network.

We intend for this to be the first iteration in a series of many such papers designed to keep the debate honest and — to the highest degree possible — based on facts.

In case you are pressed for time, here are 6 key takeaways:

Yes, I know, volts isn’t germane..but cool pic, right? Pic by Thomas Kelley

1. Bitcoin’s Energy Usage Is A Major Component Of Its Network Security Model

Unlike previous centralised network infrastructures where a third party is in total control, in a distributed system, part of the key to keeping the transaction record honest is determining who gets to write to the database.

In the Bitcoin protocol, any entity requesting write privileges (adding pages) to the distributed database (ledger) has to prove an expenditure of energy (work).

Why? They need to prove that it cost them something to contribute to the network; a contribution for which they are subsequently rewarded with bitcoins.

No risk (expenditure), no reward (bitcoin).

The reward being paid in bitcoin ensures the incentives are aligned between maintaining truthfulness (security) of the network and mining (writing to) the network; because acting in bad faith for the network results in diminishing the value of the bitcoin reward (financial loss for the actor).

The end result is that any reasonable attempt to fraudulently amend or append the database requires a CAPEX investment that is larger ($) than the size of the existing (honest) mining network. The larger the on-going energy expenditure and prior CAPEX expenditure, the larger the required investment to attack.

2. Prior Reports On Bitcoin’s Energy Footprint Were Greatly Exaggerated

Our calculations show prior reports overestimated by a factor of nearly two*.

Where our research produced an estimate of 35 TWh in mid-May, prior estimates had that at nearly double — 65 TWh*. We would also like to note that this is simply a criticism of previous methodologies. If the previous estimate had indeed been correct, it would suggest an even higher level of security than what is currently achieved.

Photo by T L on Unsplash

3. Hydro Power Actually Appears To Be The Primary Electricity Source Of The Bitcoin Mining Network

Counter to prior reports of the bitcoin network’s carbon footprint (32M Tonnes) — our research: 1) finds no proof of this claim, and 2) in fact identified the primary source of power for the mining network to be hydroelectricity*.
The reason is simple, coal is too expensive. Bitcoin mining is extremely competitive and the cheapest available electricity is most often found at stranded or seasonally overproducing renewable generation sites.

4. ‘Migratory Miners’ Seasonally Move To Wherever Conditions Are Most Suitable (Profitable)

Price pressures on electricity for mining are so strong that some miners migrate with the seasons to capture the cheapest renewables, in the most advantageous climates, often when seasonally variable production outstrips the steadier demand.

A side effect of this is that there is evidence of miners tapping into more remote/stranded/newly built sources of renewables due to the high mobility of bitcoin miners and immobility of generation infrastructure.

In this sense Bitcoin miners use bitcoin as a “synthetic battery” of sorts, converting otherwise unproductive or wasted electricity generation into spendable monetary assets.

…rumored to be miners flying North for the season by Ethan Weil

5. Annually, Network Hashrate Grows By ~300%, While Chip Efficiency Grows By ~80% And Chip Cost Per Hash Falls by ~50%

Over the last 4.5 years, the network hashrate has grown by approximately 300% annually*. Over the same time span, chip efficiency, measured in GH/J has increased by an average annual rate of nearly 80% while the chip cost per hash ($/TH/s) has fallen by an annual rate of nearly 50%*.

This means that every year, a miner’s dollar buys them nearly twice as much hashpower as the year before (CAPEX), and that new hashpower draws only a little more than half the electricity (OPEX).

6. We’re Observing Increasing Geographical Distribution Among Miners

In the wake of the unfriendly policies towards Bitcoin miners adopted by the Chinese government we areobserving an increase in miners setting up shop in the Nordic countries, Canada and north-western United States.

Common to all these locations are cool climates, availability of cheap renewable energy, high-speed internet and business-friendly governments.

That’s a good starting point to get you going.


Please note that this Blog Post and associated WhitePaper is provided on the basis that the recipient accepts the following conditions relating to the provision of the same (including on behalf of their respective organisation).

This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper does not contain or purport to be, financial promotion(s) of any kind. This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper does not contain reference to any of the investment products or services offered by members of the CoinShares Group.

Digital assets and related technologies can be extremely complicated. The digital sector has spawned concepts and nomenclature much of which is novel and can be difficult for even technically savvy individuals to thoroughly comprehend. The sector also evolves rapidly.

With increasing media attention on digital assets and related technologies, many of the concepts associated therewith (and the terms used to encapsulate them) are more likely to be encountered outside of the digital space. Although a term may become relatively well-known and in a relatively short timeframe, there is a danger that misunderstandings and misconceptions can take root relating to precisely what the concept behind the given term is.

The purpose of this Blog Post and associated WhitePaper is to provide objective, educational and interesting commentary and analysis in connection with the Bitcoin Mining Network. This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper is not directed at any particular person or group of persons. Although produced with reasonable care and skill, no representation should be taken as having been given that this Blog Post or associated WhitePaper is an exhaustive analysis of all of the considerations which its subject matter may give rise to. This White Paper fairly represents the opinions and sentiments of its author at the date of publishing but it should be noted that such opinions and sentiments may be revised from time to time, for example in light of experience and further developments, and the White Paper may not necessarily be updated to reflect the same.

Nothing within this Blog Post and associated WhitePaper constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice. This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper should not be used as the basis for any investment decision(s) which a reader thereof may be considering. Any potential investor in digital assets, even if experienced and affluent, is strongly recommended to seek independent financial advice upon the merits of the same in the context of their own unique circumstances.

This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper is subject to copyright with all rights reserved. Neither this Blog Post and associated WhitePaper nor any parts thereof may be reproduced, modified or otherwise used (for any purpose) without the prior written consent of the copyright holder.


Sign up for our monthly newsletter


Our latest insights & research. Never spam.

Terms of Entry (Use)

Users must accept these terms before they can proceed to access this website. By proceeding to access the information contained, referred or linked to on this website, users shall be deemed to have represented and warranted that the applicable laws and regulations of their relevant jurisdiction allow them to do so.

UK Investors - Self Certified Sophisticated Investor Disclosure

The content of this promotion may not have been approved by an authorised person within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Reliance on this promotion for the purpose of engaging in any investment activity may expose an individual to a significant risk of losing all of the property or other assets invested. This promotion is exempt from the general restriction (in section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000) on the communication of invitations or inducements to engage in investment activity on the ground that it is made to a self-certified sophisticated investor. A Self-Certified Sophisticated Investor is an individual who has signed within the period of twelve months ending with the day on which the communication is made, a statement confirming that at least one of the following applies:

  • The investor is a member of a network or syndicate of business angels and have been so for at least the last six months prior to the date of signing the statement;
  • The investor has made more than one investment in an unlisted company in the two years prior to the date of signing the statement;
  • The investor is working, or has worked in the two years prior to the date of signing the statement, in a professional capacity in the private equity sector, or in the provision of finance for small and medium enterprises;
  • The investor is currently, or has been in the two years prior to the date of signing the statement, a director of a company with an annual turnover of at least £1 million.

I declare that I am a self-certified sophisticated investor for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act (Financial Promotion) Order 2005. I understand that this means:

  • I can receive financial promotions that may not have been approved by a person authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority;
  • The content of such financial promotions may not conform too rules issued by the Financial Conduct Authority;
  • By signing this statement I may lose significant rights;
  • I may have no right to complain to either of the following —
    1. The Financial Conduct Authority; or
    2. The Financial Ombudsman Scheme;
  • I may have no right to seek compensation from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

If, as a recipient of this promotion you are in any doubt about the investment to which the promotion relates you should consult an person authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 specialising in advising on investments of the kind detailed in this promotion.

It should, in particular, be noted that the Tracking ETPs referenced on this website have not been, and will not be, registered under the Securities Act 1933, as amended of the United States (the "Securities Act"), or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction of the United States and may include securities in bearer form that are subject to United States tax law requirements. Such Tracking ETPs may not be offered, sold or (in the case of bearer securities) delivered within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, US persons, except pursuant to offers and sales in an offshore transaction that occurs outside the United States in accordance with the applicable provisions of Rule 903 of Regulation S under the Securities Act or pursuant to another available exemption from the registration requirements under the Securities Act.